Butterscotch Fuzz
A buttery sweet and fuzzy sixties overdrive that covers anything from Jimi to Jimmy

last update: Feb. 16, 2020

Copyright 2020 by H. Gragger. All Rights Reserved. All information provided herein is destined for educational and D.I.Y. purposes only. Commercial re-sale, distribution or usage of artwork without explicit written permission of the author is strictly prohibited. The original units  with their associated  trade-names are subject to the copyright of the individual copyright owner. The Author is by no means affiliated with any of those companies. References to trade names are made for educational purposes only. By reading the information provided here you agree to the Terms of Use.
MAIN PAGE>MUSIC STUFF>BUTTERSCOTCH

Index

Circuit Details, General Thoughts On The Architecture
Sound Samples

butterscotch picture
The Butterscotch Fuzz (click to enlarge).

A refined version of the Sam Ash Fuzz, also known as Astrotone Fuzz.

This is a
silicon only fuzz. From its topology, it is not an endless derivative of a fuzz face, it is actually more like a range master. It is simple and beautiful, buttery smooth despite using plain diodes for clipping. I thought I call it Butterscotch fuzz, since it recalls memories of soft sweet caramel with a brownish tint.

It reacts very well to the guitars volume and tone controls, and you can use it for everything from Jimi to Jimmy (pun intended), since it can get pretty nasty too and has a distinct sixties flavor. It is not as wooly as a Fuzz Face, does not have the typical mid-bark of a Tonebender, nor the smoothness of a Range Master, yet borrows from all.

It is surprisingly good-sounding and versatile for such a simple unit and never harsh or brittle.

Circuit Details, General Thoughts On The Architecture

There were not much to say about the Ash Fuzz, if you bought a stock specimen right from the store. It stems from a time when valve amps were pretty dark and needed some treble boost, and sounds pretty ghastly to me with all that treble.
Tommy Bolin used one, but he compensated its brittle tone with the equalization on his amps to get a great balanced tone. Reportedly, Leslie West used one, too, and he sounds good.

Despite of that peculiarity, they sell a re-make of it, probably to exploit the recently re-kindled interest in 60ies units.
Somebody else makes the Astrotone, a more or less cosmetic re-vamp in my opinion. There must be some Mojo in the transistors they use. However, the latter company was sane enough to change its frequency range to full-range, and lo and behold, the device sounds great.

Tone Control:

Back then, they used this very kinky and inefficient bass-cut scheme, which people report as useless, and righteously so. The Astrotone uses an adapted version, but it appears only marginally better.

Diystompboxes member DougH suggested an (actually ubiquitous) method (every bass cut on a guitar works like this) - a capacitor that gets gradually bridged by a variable resistor, which lets more bass through.
I find a 39 nF output cap for the trebly side useful, while a 470nF together with the pot gives a suitable bass cutoff sweep range.

This transforms the Ash Fuzz into something entirely different. It can go even into fuzz face territory, even Tone Bender territory. A "light" version thereof though.

Output Transistor:

The output transistor is just a plain simple voltage follower. Due to the bounding diodes at its base it never receives big signals, it never gets into clipping, nor has it gain on it. I just simply do not believe, that this contributes anything to tone, so I used a modern, low noise transistor.

Input Transistor:

Not so for the first stage. This is where tone lives. The makers of the Astrotone raised the resistors of the first stage by a hair, which IMHO is just a measure to justify a re-make. This will not do much. Although using a silicon transistor, the one(s) used will likely have been low gain.

The N.O.S. 2N2962 (allegedly a BC108 sound-a-like) I have galore, works perfectly (gain=150), although it was phased out due to being noisy.  A 2N2222 metal can was not bad either, a MPSA06 worked well too. I finally settled for ye old trusted 2N3904 for no other reason than sounding the best of all of them. You could go round and round endlessly finding one that sounds better. All of the above are a lot quieter than the prior specimen.

Interestingly, despite the common 1N4148 diode clipper used, this unit sounds nowhere near a contemporary diode clipper device with op-amps. The drive through the front transistor must be so weak that it cannot drive the diodes hard. Some people claim, its sound crosses into overdrive territory - I donīt hear that. In fact, I never had a dedicated (contemporary) overdrive that sounded anywhere nearly as good, neither did any of them react comparable upon volume pot riding.

Input Impedance:

Despite having a different architecture than a fuzz face, this unit suffers from low input impedance like the fuzz face does. This means, that the guitarīs volume control travel is greatly distorted and thus a small rotation makes a big step in loudness. As may have become obvious by now, this is not something we must live with (unless somebody likes the rather on-off-action of the volume pot). A buffer preceding the effect will restore normal volume control travel. It appears that this unit does not react to being driven hard as bad as a fuzz face does.

Other little add-ons:

Note that I added a small resistor to the ground leg of the input attenuator, which prevents the signal from going to zero. No need to go to zero.
I also added the notorious R.F. filter to the input, since the bandwidth of any unit should always be limited to the frequencies of interest. An dedicated anti-pop resistor on the input is superfluous, since there is a 100k resistor there that serves well.

Note the way I arranged the supply filtering sequence - like they do it on tube amps: the "quietest" stage on the input receives the most filtered supply rail. Overkill? Maybe, but itīs cheap and does not harm.

circuit, click to download
Butterscotch circuit (click to download PDF file):

you are going to need a PDF viewer to view this file.                                      

Back To Index


Sound Samples

The recordings have been done using the following setup and no further processing:

  • Strat with Bill Lawrence (Wilde Pickups) microcoils, pickups as specified,
  • J-FET buffer directly after the guitar
  • Butterscotch Fuzz: Fuzz=15, Tone=9 (7=full bass) (Total volume is louder than unity to get the subsequent stage going...)
  • Wampler Euphoria Overdrive, setting = natural. Gain = 1. Slight crunch appears when guit. vol = full and heavy playing. This mimics a tube amp on the edge of breakup as discussed in Using The Fuzz Right
  • Peavey Bandit 112 silver stripe, clean channel, Resonance on, T-Dynamics fully down, volume=9, all others=12
  • Rode M3 mic @ 20cm distance
  • Recording device: Focusrite PC interface into DAW
(Names may be copyrighted by the associated copyright holder, no association with any of them)

A few quick and nasty takes. No exercise in timing or else, excuse the amateur playing. Crank you speakers. Sounds darker on my Hifi than live.

Fuzzy and ballsy.
Full bass on the guitar, treble cut capacitor medium, neck pickup.
Sounds like a hell of a tube stack smolderinī, but is actually all transistor at bedroom loudness.


 
Cleaner, becomes more nasty like a Tone Bender.
Bass cut slightly, less treble cut, neck+bridge parallel




Note how much different this sounds although I changed nothing on the fuzz! It is also fairly quiet, the unit used for the demos is not even housed!

Back To Index

Update History
  • Feb. 16, 2020  first release
Back To Index
MAIN PAGE>MUSIC STUFF>BUTTERSCOTCH

MAIN PAGE | MUSIC STUFF | IMPRESSUM

(c) 2020 AQUATAUR Musik & Elektronik


E